The splinter story
Charles W. Kingston broke with mainstream LDS leadership over doctrines including plural marriage. Sources differ on exact excommunication dates; their accounts are linked for comparison.
Compare historiesOne organization, several names, decades of history—and an unusual relationship between religious leadership, cooperative economics, and polygamy.
The group is commonly called the Kingston Order or Kingston Group. Published histories identify the Davis County Cooperative Society as its cooperative organization and the Latter Day Church of Christ as its religious organization.
These names should not be confused with the much larger Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Belonging to either faith is not evidence of misconduct.
SOURCE: GROUP HISTORYDCCS = Cooperative society
The Order = Common nickname
Latter Day Church of Christ = Religious entity
Photography is illustration, not an identification, an accusation, or proof of where a person worships.


History matters. So does being precise about where accounts differ.
Charles W. Kingston broke with mainstream LDS leadership over doctrines including plural marriage. Sources differ on exact excommunication dates; their accounts are linked for comparison.
Compare historiesHistories identify Elden Kingston and the beginnings of the Davis County Cooperative Society, a shared-assets and religious community.
Kingston Expositor historyHistories report that John Ortell Kingston expanded the organization and promoted marriages among close relatives. These are historical accounts, not findings about every member.
Historical overviewPublished histories identify Paul Elden Kingston as Ortell's successor. Current civil complaints make additional claims about his leadership and control, which remain allegations.
Source overviewNot every member practices the same things. Shared ancestry or religious membership is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Cooperative structure, leadership succession and plural marriage are described by multiple published sources.
Read the historyThere are real criminal judgments and appellate decisions. They bind the people involved—not every Kingston.
State v. KingstonRecent civil complaints contain serious assertions. Naming a defendant is not the same as a finding of liability.
Read reporting